Gaffe over minimum wage

Controversy Surrounding Minimum Wage Debate

The Federal Government and labor leaders seem to be caught in a gridlock over an issue that should have been resolved swiftly. They are unnecessarily entangled in a dispute that could potentially raise their blood pressure levels.

While the Federal Government is working tirelessly without reaching a consensus on a national minimum wage for several years, state governors are evasive, claiming they cannot even afford the initial N60,000 minimum wage that Organized Labor turned down. For instance, while Edo State is willing to pay N70,000, Cross River State is proposing N40,000.

The Federal Government’s argument that state governments should be capable of paying higher wages due to the larger monthly allocation of funds they receive from the Federal Account Allocation Committee holds weight.

Following the Federal Government’s revised offer of N62,000, Organized Labor countered with N250,000, although Festus Osifo, President of the Trade Union Congress, seemed open to negotiations based on his demeanor.

Initially, Labor proposed N615,000, then reduced it to N494,000, and eventually to N250,000. On the other hand, the Organized Private Sector, appearing somewhat disengaged, appears to support the Federal Government’s initial offer of N60,000.

Interestingly, there has been no clarification on whether the figures being discussed solely represent the basic salary, or if they include non-taxable housing, transport, and meal allowances that typically accompany basic salaries.

It appears that civil servants in the Federal Government bureaucracy enjoy prolonging discussions on the perpetual issue of the national minimum wage, which remains unresolved from one administration to the next.

Civil servants seem to have adeptly maneuvered others to champion their cause, while portraying themselves as impartial bystanders facilitating negotiations between Labor and government.

Moreover, they have found a way to burden politicians who lack a clear strategy for addressing salary and wage issues, not only for civil servants but also for all workers nationwide.

It is worth noting that there is minimal scrutiny on the exorbitant salaries, allowances (including the mysterious “hardship allowance”), and other benefits received by politicians such as the President, governors, ministers, legislators, and their various aides and advisors.

Information on the remuneration of Nigerian Senators remains shrouded in mystery, with even former Senators safeguarding their earnings as if bound by a solemn oath of secrecy akin to the code enforced by Italian mafiosi.

Civil servants seem to revel in escalating unnecessary drama through the media, consistently derailing discussions and negotiations from the core issues amidst the recurring cycle of false starts.

An elderly friend who is a retired top corporate executive believes the Federal Government should establish a minimum wage floor and allow employers, including the government at various levels and corporate entities, to align their wages accordingly.

The Federal Government, as per Section 34 of the Exclusive Legislative List of the 1999 Constitution, has the sole obligation to determine a national minimum wage for the country or its regions.

The establishment of the National Salaries Incomes and Wages Commission by Act 99 of 1993 signifies its mandate to address issues concerning salaries and wages of all Nigerian workers, not limited to government employees. Therefore, the unnecessary involvement of the Presidency in a task assigned to a government statutory agency raises questions.

Instead of embroiling the Ministers of Finance, Budget, and Labor in the dispute, the NSIWC should establish a minimum wage threshold and allow sector-specific labor unions to negotiate for acceptable, possibly higher, wages with their respective employers.

This approach confines negotiations within sectoral entities, steering clear of needless turbulence that tarnishes the government’s reputation. The government is unlikely to prevail in wage discussions against Organized Labor.

The central labor organization should focus on overarching issues, while allowing sectoral unions to address matters within their domains before central leadership intervenes, if necessary.

Ideally, the Federal Government should exclusively negotiate with its sectoral unions like the Nigeria Civil Service Union representing junior workers and the Association of Senior Civil Servants of Nigeria post reaffirming the minimum wage threshold.

It’s worth noting that when the Federal Government increased salaries of federal civil servants by 25 to 35 percent on January 1, 2024, Organized Labor remained silent. The civil servants, now being championed by Organized Labor, accepted the pay raise without resistance.

Dr. Chris Ngige, the former Minister of Labor and Employment, attracted criticism for meddling in external affairs, drawing ire from the Academic Staff Union of Universities President Prof. Emmanuel Osodeke for disparaging lecturers and disseminating fake information during the eight-month ASUU strike in 2022.

While most labor leaders are attending the International Labour Organization conference at the Palais des Nations in Geneva, the responsibility now rests on President Bola Tinubu before the conference concludes on June 14.

All indications suggest that Mr. Wale Edun, the Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister of the Economy, faces the daunting challenge of formulating an irresistible offer to the unions.

To craft an acceptable offer for the unions, the government and private sector should align with the objectives of the ILO: fostering employment, upholding workers’ rights, expanding social protection, and promoting social dialogue.

Somewhere within these objectives lies the potential for establishing a fair, realistic, and acceptable living wage. Perhaps kickstarting efforts to revitalize Nigeria’s stagnant economy could serve as the foundation for resolving this issue.

While the proposed Accelerated Stabilization and Advancement Plan aimed at addressing economic reform challenges and stimulating the economy seemed promising, its denial, possibly due to rumored inclusion of a N5.4 billion petrol subsidy, leaves Nigeria’s fragile economy devoid of a lifeline even amid hopes for a resurgence.

Had the ASAP document been accessible, it could have provided the necessary initiatives for long-term economic growth in Nigeria and tackling immediate challenges effectively.

Amidst all this, adhering to the Cost of Living Adjustment model could offer guidance to navigate the tumultuous debate surrounding the national minimum wage. The revised remuneration model must factor in the devaluation of the Naira and prevailing inflation rates.

The prevailing economic inflation in the country demands urgent attention.

X:@lekansote1

The post Gaffe over minimum wage appeared first on NewsNow Nigeria.

Leave a Reply